Two Bad Pro-Life Responses to Bodily Rights Arguments

Release Date:

Even before ERI officially began, Josh and Tim cared a lot about helping pro-life people to think well and take pro-choice arguments seriously. They don’t think every single pro-choice argument is a good argument (there are a lot of really bad arguments on both sides), but we won’t be persuasive unless we can recognize and take the stronger pro-choice arguments seriously. In this piece, Josh addresses two bad pro-life responses to some of the stronger pro-choice arguments. Related Links: Josh Brahm: Understanding and Responding to Bodily Rights Arguments (includes Josh's speech): http://bit.ly/2mZugjg The Alan Guttmacher Institute’s 2005 survey of more than 1,200 abortion patients: http://bit.ly/2IQs9VO Timothy Brahm: Autumn in the Sovereign Zone: Why “It’s My Body, I Can Do What I Want” Won’t Do: http://bit.ly/2x3TugP Judith Jarvis Thomson’s violinist story or “people-seeds” analogy: http://bit.ly/2I0D4v0 Share the original article: http://bit.ly/2gBTlv8 ERI Website: https://EqualRightsInstitute.com ERI Blog: https://Blog.EqualRightsInstitute.com ERI Course: https://EquippedCourse.com

Two Bad Pro-Life Responses to Bodily Rights Arguments

Title
Two Bad Pro-Life Responses to Bodily Rights Arguments
Copyright
Release Date

flashback