The Downfall Of Diddy: Prosecutors And Diddy Plead Their Case For A Gag Order (10/27/24)

Release Date:

In United States v. Combs, case number 24-cr-542 (AS), Sean Combs has submitted a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian proposing specific language for a gag order in response to alleged leaks by the government. Combs argues that these leaks have involved confidential, damaging, and false information released to the media, which could prejudice his right to a fair trial. The defense believes a gag order is necessary to mitigate the impact of this information on the jury pool and to preserve the integrity of the judicial process.The proposed gag order, outlined in the attached Exhibit A, seeks to restrict public statements by both parties and limit the release of information related to the case. Combs' legal team contends that this measure is crucial to ensure a fair and unbiased trial, citing previous court discussions on October 10, 2024, regarding the need for such relief. They maintain that without these protections, the continued flow of leaked information could compromise the defendant’s ability to receive a fair hearing.(commercial at 11:35)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.50.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Downfall Of Diddy: Prosecutors And Diddy Plead Their Case For A Gag Order (10/27/24)

Title
The Downfall Of Diddy: Prosecutors And Diddy Plead Their Case For A Gag Order (10/27/24)
Copyright
Release Date

flashback