172: In defence of the discussion section

Dan and James discuss a recent proposal to do away with discussion sections and suggest other stuff they'd like to get rid of from academic publishing.
Links
* The paper (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04267-3) on the proposed elimiation of the discussion section
* The paper (https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920970949) on machine readable hypothesis tests
* Our episodes (https://everythinghertz.com/guests/daniel-lakens) with Daniel Lakens
* Our episode (https://everythinghertz.com/78) with Lisa DeBruine
Everything Hertz on social media
- Dan on twitter (https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
- James on twitter (https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
- Everything Hertz on twitter (https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
- Everything Hertz on Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Support us on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast) and get bonus stuff!
$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, August 31) "172: In defence of the discussion section", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/N3SFT